Feedback on assignment
Your work shows good imagination and creativity in picking up on the
influence of Andrea Michele Landini’s 'Magic Trip'. It would have been worth
while quoting the book using the harvard reference system - a guide to this
can be found on the OCA’s website. Other than this I think that this is a great
approach to the brief presenting images that are a novel and refreshing theme
to illustrate the brief.
There’s a balance to be struck between meeting the brief to illustrate the topic
and creating an interesting image that falls into the theme. Quite where and
how you strike the balance is up to you; however, some of your images have
the balance favouring the theme and placing illustrating the brief second.
In some instances, I feel that your foreknowledge of the scene colours your
description and interpretation of the image. Others, who don’t have this
knowledge, perhaps don’t see or recognise the elements in the image that
you see. For example, your image of two points. Of itself this wouldn’t matter
but I suggest that your foreknowledge distracts you from other possibilities for
the image.
In this case your distinct and irregular shape image - I find recognising the
road sign hard if not impossible. This doesn’t matter; but I suggest that the
images as you have it contains several shapes and as such may be
distracting. I suggest a tighter crop to simplify the image and concentrate
attention more on the fulfillment on the brief.
I particularly like your introduction of elements of the car to the image that lifts
the image out of the ordinary interpretation of the brief. Your creativity is ably
demonstrated. An example of this is your illustration of diagonal - window
washer.
A couple of suggestions on this image: the placement of the screen wash
nozzle - you have it very close to the top of the frame; would it be better to
place this on the top left third intersection? Another suggestion to strengthen
the notion of lifting the image out of the ordinary might be to sprinkle water
droplets on to the bonnet of the car. Just thoughts to add to an already good
image.
There are one or two images that might be improved technically. A couple of
them seem to have suspect focus.
Examples of this are where you have dust or other ‘specs’ on the car body.
See the image ‘flying high’ where the specs are blurred and compare this to
the narrow lines image where the specs are sharp. Y0our ‘U-turn’ image also
seems to be unsharp. The actual handle rather than the reflections should I
feel be sharp.
Suggestions/thoughts on the images are as follows:
Single point - good image that works well. The fence posts in the top right of
frame are perhaps a little distracting in terms of moving attention away from
the post box. Suggestion: move the camera view to put the post box top right
of frame.
Two Points - good image that fits the theme but not convinced about ‘two
points’ there is a strong diagonal which makes for a good composition but
there are several ‘points’ along it.
Several Points - Yes a good image but the several points are fairly uniform
and the dark area on the left of frame is perhaps distracting - how about
rotating the image and cropping it to lessen its impact:
Your second image (signs of the tree) I feel is the better of the two. I
particularly like the rippling of the paint work on the right of frame as this keys
the viewer into the two scenes in the image - the reflection and the actuality of
the car body work.
Horizontal and Vertical Lines - As you say a simple shot that mets the brief
and the theme but it is perhaps a little ordinary. I wonder if an increase
contrast might help - see what you think:
Diagonal - A good shot again - I’ve already commented about the positioning
of the nozzle.
Curves - Yes a great image - I particularly like the contrast between the
straight blurred lines in the top half of the frame and the curve of the handle in
the bottom half. That you only include part of the handle also works well
leaving the viewer to extrapolate this ‘missing’ aspect.
Distinct Shape - I’ve already commented on this one. I like the ‘sharp’ dust
specs that again give the viewer the two aspects: the actual car panel and the
abstract shape.
Triangle - Both good shots. I prefer the first one: it’s sharp and shows the
triangles well while keeping within the theme of the set of images. THe
second image I feel while has the triangle of the two ‘blobs’ of the signs and
the edge of the handle, it suffers from the distraction of the cars at the bottom
of the frame. Also I feel it would benefit from having the specs on the right of
the frame sharp as this would be in keeping with ‘Distinct shape’.
Rhythm - Yes a good image but this is one image that I feel you have the
balance between theme and brief wrong. Yes the eye can be thought to
bobble across the tops of the trees moving from left to right, but I think that
there are too many other distraction in the image that are concerned with the
theme. There are better images (in terms of meeting the brief) amoung your
images on your blog exercise for rhythm; but I realise that they don’t fall in
with the theme.
Like the notion of “a pinch of salt” as an illustration of the topic. The focus
tends to be on the van but as this is recognisably little it also fits the bill.
Would try for a squarer crop and not use rounded corners.
Pattern - Another good image that shows your good observation and
creativity. It makes a good interesting and well composed image. But consider
the brief - pattern... this supposes a repeating (probably single) pattern that
extends beyond the edges of the frame. In your image the main pattern is the
squares of the carport but thees are then dominated by the strong diagonal
midway up the frame and then further dissipated towards the top of the frame
by the other shapes/objects and colours.
I’m not saying your image is wrong or bad just alerting you to where your
pursuit of the theme is overwhelming the brief.
No comments:
Post a Comment